Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2586 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €20.16 vs €399.99
- Up to 94% better value when playing Saints Row than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.14 vs €2.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Saints Row than Celeron G530 - 159 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
144
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17264 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
5%
Price, €
€399.99
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |