Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €20.16 vs €362.25
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700KF - €0.12 vs €1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G530 - 196 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17008 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
6%
Price, €
€362.25
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €362.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17008 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |