Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3714 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €20.16 vs €385.16
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900KF - €0.14 vs €2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G530 - 183 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
142
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4033 minutes ago
Buy for €385.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |