Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2683 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - €20.16 vs €389.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-9600KF - €0.17 vs €2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G530 - 135 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 6 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
116
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18236 minutes ago
Buy for €389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |