Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 215 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €60.24 vs €180.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.13 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 478 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18404 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
478
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
34%
Price, €
€180
33%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
