Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €60.24 vs €199.95
- Up to 66% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-10700F - €0.16 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G4900 - 424 vs 378 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
378
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15424 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
424
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
34%
Price, €
€199.95
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |