Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i7-7700 - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €204.4 vs €260.31
- Up to 21% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700F - €1.01 vs €1.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
78%
Price, €
€260.31
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7376 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €204.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7376 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |