Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 760 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9500T - 272 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500T - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €159.99 vs €246.03
- Up to 32% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - €0.61 vs €0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
67%
Price, €
€246.03
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FPS
261
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |