Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1800 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |