Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 278 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - 219 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |