Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 667 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Naples | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
