Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1949 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 21% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-6200 - 109 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 64 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 3 |
64 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
