Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2363 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2400S - 162 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
152
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |