Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €35.49 vs €496.71
- Up to 92% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-9700F - €0.46 vs €5.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Celeron G1820 - 88 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
77
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |