Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2410 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €35.49 vs €424.03
- Up to 85% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €0.15 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 72% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 413 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
240
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |