Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 68 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900K - 162 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €424.03 vs €425.94
- Up to 1% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900K - €2.62 vs €2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€424.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13667 minutes ago
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |