Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900KF - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €318.6 vs €424.03
- Up to 23% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €1.76 vs €2.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 20 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5250 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€318.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |