Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700X - 194 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €319.48 vs €425.94
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - €1.77 vs €2.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
80%
Price, €
€425.94
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12388 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
180
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €319.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |