Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €35.49 vs €339.95
- Up to 88% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10850K - €0.19 vs €1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 206 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
11%
Price, €
€339.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €339.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |