Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2956 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €35.49 vs €271.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-12700F - €0.23 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 38% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for €271 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |