Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-9700F - 732 vs 576 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €560.0 vs €566.5
- Up to 21% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-9700F - €0.77 vs €0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €566.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
732
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |