Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1352 days newer than Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700F - 565 vs 384 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
54.89014883061658%
Multi-Core
6256
35.79152125407632%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |