Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 202 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 61 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €399.99 vs €566.5
- Up to 23% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-9700F - €7.14 vs €9.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €566.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18220 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
91%
Value, €/FPS
€7.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |