Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2102 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 10% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron B820 - 117 vs 106 FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |