Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1157 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron B820 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |