Buy on Amazon
€379.64
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2244 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron 847 - 197 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
