Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3943 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in F1 22 than Celeron 847 - 289 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€458.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €458.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |