Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2865 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron 847 - 131 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
