Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1699 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €379.64 vs €458.65
- Up to 11% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-12900KS - €1.88 vs €2.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 217 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
89%
Price, €
€458.65
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |