Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4118 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 33% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 847 - 215 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |