Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 253 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Celeron 847 - 671 vs 662 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
671
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |