Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 492 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Celeron 847 - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6300 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
