Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2687 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €42.6 vs €74.07
- Up to 43% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.08 vs €0.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than FX-6200 - 522 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6641 minutes ago
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |