Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 1098 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 3205U - 162 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 6 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |