Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 455 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 15 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 3205U - 205 vs 198 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11780 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |