Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €88.65 vs €786.40
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X - €0.66 vs €4.85 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 162 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for €786.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 170 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |