Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €87.51 vs €163.90
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - €0.15 vs €0.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G6900 - 672 vs 583 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
583
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7417 minutes ago
Buy for €163.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7417 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |