Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-14900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-14900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 385 days older than the cheaper Core i9-14900KF.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-14900KF - 203 vs 200 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €467.89 vs €769.42
- Up to 38% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7950X - €2.34 vs €3.79 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
62%
Price, €
€769.42
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €769.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
200
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €467.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
170 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |