Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 and the cheaper Celeron G6900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €87.51 vs €339.00
- Up to 72% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-12400 - €0.25 vs €0.90 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 378 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7154 minutes ago
Buy for €339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |