Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - €87.51 vs €110.27
- Up to 8% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 5600 - €0.22 vs €0.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G6900 - 451 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7195 minutes ago
Buy for €110.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |