Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €88.65 vs €403.39
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900KF - €0.66 vs €2.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 154 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
25%
Price, €
€403.39
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €403.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |