Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €53.15 vs €81.96
- Up to 32% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.45 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15204 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |