Buy on Amazon
€20.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €20.59 vs €67.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.08 vs €0.25 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in Apex Legends than FX-4100 - 270 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
vhbw 2X Druckerpatronen Tintenpatronen Set kompatibel mit Samsung SF-4200, SF-4220, SF-4400, FX-4000, FX-4100 Ersatz für Samsung INK-M10, Lexmark 13400HC.
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-4100 or Ryzen 3 3200G
Apex Legends, 1920 x 1080, High
66 FPS
€10.59/FPS
Radeon RX 6400
Ryzen 3 3200G
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
