Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1359 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €20.59 vs €74.94
- Up to 70% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-6600K - €0.09 vs €0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 12% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-4100 - 249 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 91 vs 95 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |