Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 77% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €18.39 vs €80.0
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4100 - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75664 minutes ago
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |