Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2383 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than FX-6200 - 517 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 51% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - €42.6 vs €86.08
- Up to 53% better value when playing World of Tanks than Athlon 200GE - €0.08 vs €0.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |