Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 45% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 138 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
