Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 3580 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i7-940 - 264 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 51% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - €49.0 vs €100.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing F1 22 than Athlon 200GE - €0.19 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12603 minutes ago
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12603 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |