Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than M2A Starship Mini - 214 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1579.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Battlefield V than M2A Starship Mini - €7.38 vs €8.17 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
208
97.19626168224299%
Value, €/FPS
€8.17/FPS
90.33047735618115%
Price, €
€1699
92%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50300 minutes ago
17th Variation
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1579
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
82.92929292929291%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
83.8924963924964%
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Core i7-11700F
null-core
Single-Core
2101
84.95754144763445%
Multi-Core
8790
67.38730450781969%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-11700F |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |