Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 26% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 87 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €19.53 vs €21.0 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 15% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1449.0 vs €1699.0
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46151 minutes ago
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
74.11693057247261%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
74.13459471081488%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
